Search found 6 matches
- Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:17 am
- Forum: Camera comments
- Topic: Foitzik: Reporter
- Replies: 0
- Views: 14060
Foitzik: Reporter
there are at least 3 versions, the one in the picture is Foinix Orito
- Mon Oct 14, 2024 10:16 am
- Forum: Camera comments
- Topic: Voigtl�nder: Superb Prototype
- Replies: 0
- Views: 21916
Voigtl�nder: Superb Prototype
the year is not correct, 1956 is the year for this prototype
- Mon Oct 14, 2024 9:10 am
- Forum: Camera comments
- Topic: ICA: Fulgur
- Replies: 0
- Views: 21595
ICA: Fulgur
I suspect that this is the camera because it seems to be built by Hüttig, the Hüttig Merkur model has the name plate in exactly the same style, it used metal frames for the viewfinders like the Fulgur, and I know that for a while Hüttig products were marketed under the name ICA.
- Sat Oct 12, 2024 2:29 am
- Forum: Camera comments
- Topic: Royal Camera: Royal 35
- Replies: 0
- Views: 28826
Royal Camera: Royal 35
I think the correct year of manufacture is rather 1955
- Sun Oct 06, 2024 1:12 am
- Forum: Camera comments
- Topic: Ringfoto: Ringfoto Color
- Replies: 0
- Views: 23267
Ringfoto: Ringfoto Color
I think there are several cameras with this name, the one I own is identical to Impera - Indo
I know that there is another one that resembles a King Regula version
I know that there is another one that resembles a King Regula version
- Fri Sep 20, 2024 5:02 am
- Forum: Camera comments
- Topic: Bolta (Photavit): Boltavit
- Replies: 1
- Views: 50595
Re: Bolta (Photavit): Boltavit
it should be mentioned that the devices in both representative images have a broken shutter arm